Vol. 63, No. 4 | April 2006
Classifieds | Display Ads | Back to Contents

Preserving What We Value
By Sue M. Holden

At some point every bar leader is faced with a decision, when some problem, challenge or issue arises for their bar association:  should I lead the bar in this area or not?  And decisions made in those instances can have meaningful effect on the association and on the legal profession, for better or worse, for years to come.

Fortunately, most decisions a bar president makes do not have the potential for impact years beyond their term.  But it is the challenge of every bar leader to identify those instances where critical values are at issue and to make the decision to lead.  And it is equally incumbent on all lawyers to get involved in your bar association so you can have an impact on the future of the bar and your profession.

Legislative Advocacy

There is perhaps no area where the MSBA has greater impact on the profession than in its legislative advocacy efforts.  All professionals have something to offer the legislative process, but I believe lawyers have a special role.  As practitioners we know how laws affect people’s everyday lives.  This perspective gives us a special insight, but equally a special responsibility, to remedy laws that cause unintended consequences and to help craft a legal process that serves the public interest and is accessible to all. 

Our legislative activity fulfills one of the express missions of the MSBA, to “apply the knowledge and experience of the profession to the public good,” and members consistently rank this as a high priority.  MSBA monitors and influences legislation affecting lawyers and is a credible voice in support of equal rights and justice for everyone.  In previous legislative sessions, MSBA has lobbied against sales taxes on legal services, certain statutory restrictions on attorneys fees, and unfair limitations on access to the courts.  We have supported adequate funding for legal services for the indigent as well as for the courts and our public defense system.  Volunteers in our committees and sections have reviewed and made recommendations for action on a variety of uniform laws and issues surrounding judicial election or selection.  Annually, practitioners in our sections develop recommendations for substantive changes to statutes in the area of their technical expertise.  In doing this, we help improve the laws that lawyers work with everyday and fulfill an important dimension of our mission.

Current Challenges

At the start of my term as your president I had hoped we would spend some time this year considering the values in our justice system and in our profession that are worth preserving.  As I noted in my July 2005 column, of particular interest to me are “the values that make our justice system appealing to others in the world: the guiding principle of ‘Equal Justice Under Law’ which provides every citizen access to the courts to resolve disputes with the help of an independent judge guided by the rule of law.”  I had no idea at that time what the 8th Circuit’s decision would be in RPM v. White or what significant efforts would be undertaken by the bar aimed at preserving the impartiality of judges and the integrity of our courts.

But there are other threats to our profession, whose impact will be as significant on our future, that warrant a response by lawyers and the bar.  The confidential attorney-client relationship is at the very heart of the role of lawyers, and attacks against that relationship and against the independence of the profession are increasing.

The examples of these attacks are numerous.  Consider the attorney liability provisions of the bankruptcy reform laws enacted last year.  These require debtors’ attorneys to certify the accuracy of information their clients provide in schedules of assets and liabilities and require attorneys to certify the debtors’ ability to make payments, all under penalty of harsh sanctions against the attorney personally.  Or consider the federal Sentencing Guidelines that authorize and encourage the government to require companies, associations, and other entities under criminal investigation to waive their attorney-client privilege and work-product protections to qualify for leniency.  Contemplate legislation proposed in Congress that could make it a crime for attorneys to provide services to people who are in this country illegally.  Or contemplate the possibility that unauthorized interception of phone conversations between attorneys and their detained clients becomes the accepted norm in fighting against terrorism.

Strength in Members

The ABA, the MSBA, and other bar associations have responded over the years to these and other attacks on foundational principles of the legal profession.  This has been an increasingly critical role for bar associations in recent years, both within their own states and nationally.  I have gone to Washington, D.C. several times over the years to participate in ABA Days on Capitol Hill, talking to members of Minnesota’s congressional delegation about issues important to the legal profession.  President-elect Patrick Kelly and I will be doing that again this year in early May.

Bar associations are nothing more than organized efforts of their members.  The MSBA is only as effective as its members.  We need your input and your energy to maximize our effectiveness, and your diverse backgrounds, skills and knowledge to improve our profession.  So, if you are tired of the tenor of discussion about lawyers or judges in your community, if you want to prevent further erosion of fundamental values, rights and principles in our laws, if you want to know that your voice is heard and make a positive difference in the profession, get active in the MSBA.  There is a role for each one of us in preserving the values of the profession.

If you have comments about this article or insights on its topic, I would like to hear from you at smholden@statebar.gen.mn.us


SUSAN M. HOLDEN is president of the Minnesota State Bar Association. A partner and member of the board of directors of the Minneapolis personal injury firm of Sieben, Grose, Von Holtum & Carey, Ltd., she is certified as a civil trial specialist by the MSBA.