Vol. 65, No. 6 | July 2008
Classifieds | Display Ads | Back to contents

The Lake Wobegon Conceit
By Michael J. Ford

Divine Intervention and the Preservation of the Minnesota Judiciary;
Or, Why Doing Nothing to Preserve an Impartial Judiciary is Not an Option

I was struck the other day by the observation that Minnesota need not change the way that it selects and retains judges because here, in Minnesota, we have good people who serve as judges.

That comment necessarily implies that the reason that other states have struggled with judicial elections is because they don’t have good people serving, or seeking to serve, as judges.

I have referred to this in the past as what I call “the Lake Wobegon conceit” which describes the notion that here, in Minnesota, we are special. Because we are special, so the thinking goes, we need not create a process that will guard against the politicization of the judiciary.

It is akin to the notion that divine intervention will protect the judiciary from politicization.

Let me tell a tale from my personal history to illustrate.

Great Players

During college I spent a few years riding the bench for the St. John’s University football team up in Collegeville. John Gagliardi was well on the way to reaching iconic status by that time and currently has amassed more wins than any other college football coach in history.1

Much has been written about how he has done it with many claiming that his success is due to great players.

But other coaches have great players—and yet they don’t win year in and year out as he has, and still does.

It is my belief that a key ingredient in John Gagliardi’s success is that he never tasks an individual player beyond their capability.

During one of my first practices for “John” I was trying to defeat a double team block by two offensive linemen. Other coaches had taught me that the way to do that was to be tougher than my opponents. Therefore, I was trying to take one player on one shoulder, the other player on my other shoulder, split them apart and then go in to make the tackle.

After watching me struggle, John took me aside and asked me what I was trying to accomplish. Upon being told what my goal was he replied, “Son, if you can regularly defeat two opponents of equal size, speed and ability, you don’t need a coach, you need a blue suit, a red cape and an “S” on your chest.”

He then went about the business of instructing us on how to work within a defensive system that does not require any individual player to be Superman in order for it to succeed.

Unlike the coaches I had run into up to that point, John Gagliardi rarely, if ever, required a superhuman effort from any of his players. Rather, he devoted the time, attention and the energy needed to develop a system that enhanced the skills of each of his players in order to achieve an overall successful team effort.

Systemic Support

This was a revelation to me. Other coaches I had worked with emphasized mental and physical toughness. Conditioning and “toughening up” drills that were savage and relatively pointless marked the regimen of most football programs, then and now.

Make no mistake about it; the John Gagliardi system requires excellent football players.

But all football programs have excellent football players. It is not the players that fail the system in those programs; it is the systems that fail the players.

Good judges, like good football players, are the start, not the end of the process of creating and maintaining an excellent judiciary

In order to be successful, a system for selecting, retaining and maintaining an impartial judiciary cannot rely on tasking individual judges to “be good.” A system that allows, and even encourages, judges to politicize their campaigns for judicial office will be asking too much of individual judges. In the heat of a political campaign, it would take supermen and superwomen to refrain from doing that which their opponents can legally do.

If Minnesota maintains such a system, none of us will have any business complaining when candidates for judicial office stoop to campaign practices that the law allows.

The critic who faults individual candidates for conducting politicized judicial election campaigns is like the football coach who complains about his players failing to execute when it is the coach who failed to develop a system for his players to execute within.

There are some who say that John Gagliardi’s success has been the result of divine intervention.

I doubt that divine intervention is the reason for the success of the John Gagliardi football program.

I am certain that Minnesota will not be able to count on divine intervention to preserve the impartial judiciary we have enjoyed thus far.

Notes
1 http://www.gojohnnies.com/football/jg.htm (“The winningest coach all-time in college football history, Gagliardi (Guh-lahr-dee) ended the 2007 season with a 453-122-11 (.782) collegiate career record and a 429-116-10 (.782) record at SJU. Gagliardi’s 59 years of collegiate coaching is the most in college football history, surpassing the old record of 57 years held by former University of Chicago and University of the Pacific coach Amos Alonzo Stagg (1890-1946).”)


MICHAEL J. FORD is president of the Minnesota State Bar Association. A shareholder in the law firm of Quinlivan & Hughes, P.A., St. Cloud, Minnesota, he is a graduate of St. John’s University and received his J.D. from the William Mitchell College of Law. He concentrates his practice in the areas of civil litigation, insurance coverage, employment and government liability, and land use and general casualty law.