Judiciary Committee

Minutes

10/26/05 | 10/24/06 | 4/20/07 | 5/21/07 | 9/24/07 | 10/26/07 | 11/30/07 | 1/3/08 | 02/01/08 |3/12/08

MSBA Judiciary Committee
Meeting Summary
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
12:00 p.m.


Present: Karna Peters and Mary Vasaly - Co-Chairs, Members Karen Cole, Fred Finch, Michael Iwan, Ruth Marcott, Josh Smith-Hanen, Robin Wolpert, Nancy Mischel-MSBA Staff. By phone: Members Kate Flom, Tracy Harris and Judge Stafsholt.

Report from Legislative Forum Subcommittee: Co-Chair Vasaly reported that the informational forum for legislators on February 20 only drew four legislators (Senators Gen Olson and Yvonne Prettner Solon and Representatives Joe Atkins and John Berns). Professor Malia Reddick, Justice Alan Page and former Governor Al Quie were present, along with the Judiciary Committee co-chairs and a few members. The forum began at 11:30 and unfortunately the House went into session at noon that day.

Report from Public Education Roll-out Subcommittee: Ms. Harris reported on the subcommittee's efforts to distribute information about the CD materials to attorneys across the state. Information has gone out to the county attorneys, public defenders, district bar association presidents, MSBA sections and committees. The April 14 webcast is being prominently advertised by the MSBA. Mr. Finch suggested the subcommittee write to editors of small town newspapers and offer them op-ed pieces, perhaps written by one of their local attorneys, on the importance of an impartial judiciary and judicial selection issues. Mr. Finch also suggested that a resolution regarding judicial impartiality and selection should be prepared for use at precinct caucuses.

Report on Other Outreach Efforts: Co-Chair Peters presented the video and other Judiciary Committee public education materials regarding judicial selection and impartiality at an MSBA Bench and Bar outreach CLE event in Willmar on March 7. Mike Ford, MSBA President-Elect, and Steve Besser, last year's Co-chair, assisted in the presentation. There were close to 90 attendees, including seven of the eight district judges from the 8th Judicial District, and the information was well-received. There will be another district outreach meeting in Bemidji on April 25. Ms. Peters will present there as well; she would like another volunteer from the Committee to join her.

The MSBA's Civic Education Committee had a booth at a social studies teachers conference last week. Copies of the Judiciary Committee's fact sheet and CD's were available and about 20 teachers picked them up. There will be additional opportunities to distribute the CD and talk to the public at the state fair this summer.

Update on Judicial Selection Bills at Legislature: It appears unlikely any judicial selection bill will advance this year since the first policy committee deadline is this Friday and no additional hearings are scheduled. The MDJA Board of Directors is meeting March 21 to reconsider its position on judicial selection. A number of individual judicial districts have passed resolutions supporting retention elections.

Report on New Lawsuit by Greg Wersal: Ms. Vasaly reported that Greg Wersal has filed a new lawsuit challenging some of the provisions in the Judicial Code.


MSBA Judiciary Committee
Meeting Summary
Friday, February 1, 2008
12:00 p.m.


Present: Mary Vasaly - Co-Chair, Members Don Betzold, Karen Cole, Jacqui Dorsey, Dyan Ebert, Mike Ford, Stacey Fujii, Tracy Harris, Jonathan Levy, Dana Mitchell, Brett Olander, Josh Smith-Hanen, Guests Tami Diehn and Lloyd Grooms, Nancy Mischel-MSBA Staff.
By phone: Karna Peters - Co-Chair, Members Greg Anderson, Dale Hansen.

Co-Chair Vasaly reported that she attended a workshop in Dallas sponsored by the National Center for State Courts on effective judicial campaign conduct oversight committees. Based on what she learned, Ms. Vasaly believes the documents forming Minnesota's Judicial Election Campaign Conduct Committee will serve us well. Representatives from Texas indicated that judicial candidates who do not sign the affirmation in their state are generally defeated.

Report from Legislative Forum Subcommittee:
Co-Chair Vasaly reported that the informational forum for legislators on judicial selection methods will be held February 20 at 11:30 in Room 500 of the State Office Building. Speakers include Professor Malia Reddick, Justice Alan Page and former Governor Al Quie.

Several Senate Committees are holding a joint informational hearing on February 4 at 12:30 p.m. regarding judicial selection issues. Brian Melendez is speaking on behalf of the MSBA. Other invited speakers include representatives from Minnesotans for Impartial Courts, National Center of State Courts, MN Women Lawyers and League of Women Voters. Mr. Melendez's talking points will be distributed to Committee members to enable them to answer questions they may get regarding judicial selection issues in a manner that is consistent with the MSBA's position.

Members discussed the MSBA position on judicial selection, which leaves open the option of supporting retention elections if that is the method favored by legislators. Rep. Steve Simon and Sen. Ann Rest are authoring a retention election bill on behalf of the Minnesotans for Impartial Courts (MIC). MIC held a press conference on January 31.

Mr. Grooms suggested members sign up for the MSBA Grassroots Action Network, which may be activated later this year for purposes of encouraging legislators to support change regarding judicial selection. Members can sign up online at:
http://www2.mnbar.org/grassroots/sign.asp

Ms. Peters mentioned she will be representing the MSBA position on judicial selection in an upcoming MN CLE program on the Legislative Process on February 15.

Report from Public Education Subcommittee:
Co-chair Peters reported that a letter signed by Mr. Melendez was sent to all the district bar presidents encouraging them to use the public education materials and including a copy of the CD.

MN CLE is sponsoring a webcast at noon on March 4 that will include showing the Committee's video with a live introduction by Mr. Melendez and Ms. Peters. Members discussed the possibility of obtaining CLE credit for the webcast in the hope of drawing more people. Mr. Smith-Hanen and Ms. Mischel agreed to look into this; it was noted there must be a "live" person available to answer questions in order to qualify for CLE credit. We will follow up with Frank Harris on details of the webcast, including sign up and whether it can be a free webcast.

The meeting was adjourned at 1:15 p.m.



MSBA Judiciary Committee
Meeting Summary
Thursday, January 3, 2008
12:00 p.m.

Present: Karna Peters and Mary Vasaly - Co-Chairs, Members Don Betzold, Louise Bjorkman, Karen Cole, Fred Finch, Kate Flom, Tracy Harris, Heather Lang Jacobsen, Matthew Lemke, Josh Smith-Hanen, Mike Unger, Ken White, Honorable Bruce Willis, Robin Wolpert, Nancy Mischel-MSBA Staff.
By phone: Gail Chang Bohr, Dyan Ebert, Mike Ford, Dale Hansen, Mike Iwan, Honorable Jon Stafsholt.

Recent Judicial Elections News: A large amount of money was spent by outside organizations to influence recent Wisconsin judicial elections. In addition, the candidates themselves raised a large amount of money. Here is an attachment to the Milwaukee Journal article that gives further details:

Judicial Elections Campaign Conduct Committee (JECCC): Co-Chair Vasaly reported that changes to documents forming the JECCC were approved by the MSBA Assembly on December 14. The Assembly also approved funding for the MSBA to seek a formal opinion from the Campaign Finance Board regarding proposed activities of the JECCC.

Report from Legislative Symposium Subcommittee:
Co-Chair Vasaly reported that a forum is being planned for February 20. This is a date that works well for the House but perhaps not as well for the Senate. The committee is inviting Rachel Payne Caufield, one of the Supreme Court Justices and one other speaker. Senator Mee Moua, Chair of the Senate's Judiciary Committee, also intends to hold a hearing on the topic of judicial elections. The subcommittee will offer to assist her in finding speakers for the hearing. Members discussed how best to reach legislators with information given the multiple demands on their time and the many important issues they will be facing this upcoming session. Despite these obstacles, members see value in creating more visibility for the issue and agreed to proceed with the forum.

MSBA lobbyist Lloyd Grooms has approached Senator Betzold and asked him to author a bill putting forward the MSBA position on judicial elections. Sen. Betzold has not yet decided if he will do so.

Report from Public Education Subcommittee: Co-Chair Peters reported that the goal of having the public education materials ready for the Assembly on December 14 was met. All Assembly members in attendance received a hard copy of the handouts, as well as a CD with all the materials, including the powerpoint and video presentation. All of the public education materials, with the exception of the video, are available on the Judiciary Committee's MSBA webpage at:
http://www2.mnbar.org/committees/judiciary/PublicEducationMaterials.html

There is also a link from the MSBA home page, left side links, under Jud. Independence Resources. Committee members were encouraged to take a CD and look for opportunities to present on the topic in their communities, and to let Nancy Mischel at the MSBA know when they do so. Nancy is keeping a map of the state in her office with red stickers added every time the materials are used in a presentation. The goal is to have the map covered in red.

Volunteers were solicited to serve on a roll-out subcommittee. This group will be charged with getting word out to lawyers, judges and other interested groups on the availability of the public education materials, so they can be presented in communities around the state. One idea is to have a point person in every bar district. Louise, Ken, Josh, Tracy and Karna volunteered for this effort and Louise agreed to convene the first meeting. An e-mail will be sent to let the members of the Judiciary Committee know that the roll-out subcommittee has been formed and that others can join if they are interested. The committee discussed a draft roll-out plan (attached). Additional suggestions for distribution points included county attorneys, colleges and universities, county district chairs, public access television and the 7th and 8th district bench & bar meetings being planned for this spring.

There was some discussion regarding the MDJA's position on judicial elections. The poll taken of MDJA members reflected different results than the in-person vote taken at their meeting.

The meeting was adjourned at 1:15 p.m.


MSBA Judiciary Committee
Meeting Summary
Friday, November 30, 2007
12:00 p.m.

Present: Karna Peters and Mary Vasaly - Co-Chairs, Members Don Betzold, Karen Cole, Fred Finch, Kate Flom, Stacey Fujii, Heather Lang Jacobsen, Dana Mitchell, Brett Olander, Steve Simon, Honorable Jon Stafsholt, Nancy Mischel-MSBA Staff.
By phone: Gail Chang Bohr, Mike Ford, David Ludescher, Paul McCarten.

Recent Judicial Elections News: Co-Chair Vasaly mentioned a recent editorial by former Justice Sandra Day O'Connor who is speaking out about the importance of maintaining impartiality in judicial elections. Recent judicial pay increases in Pennsylvania led to an effort to oust all but one of the current district court judges there, who were up for re-election in retention elections.

Report from Public Education Subcommittee: Co-Chair Peters reported that the subcommittee has prepared a number of materials for public education. There is a powerpoint, which was previously viewed by the Committee, along with new talking points that track the powerpoint presentation. The powerpoint focuses on the strong asset we have in Minnesota's judiciary which is highly regarded across the country. It also mentions various options for change. The subcommittee also developed a Judicial Selection Fact Sheet/Handout and a Question and Answer document dealing with frequently asked questions or concerns about judicial selection. Last, a DVD is being put together with the help of MN CLE that is directed to lawyers and judges who might be presenting on the topic of judicial elections. Part of the video includes Gov. Quie, who speaks about creating the merit selection commission. At the December 14 Assembly meeting, MSBA President Brian Melendez will mention the availability of these materials. Mr. Finch made a motion that the Committee approve the materials, including any remaining improvements still being made. The motion was seconded and approved. Members thanked the subcommittee for their work. Subcommittee members were Karna Peters, Robin Wolpert, Karen Cole, Kate Flom, Judge Jon Stafsholt, and Dale Hansen.

Rule of Law Conference: Ms. Peters reported that the Public Education Subcommittee reviewed information received regarding holding a Rule of Law Conference, which is being promoted by the ABA's World Justice Project. The subcommittee did not feel they had sufficient time to work on planning such a conference. Judge Stafsholt suggested perhaps something could be tied into the Equal Justice Conference that will be held here in May. Mr. Olander is on the Minnesota planning committee for the conference; he will bring the idea to their attention.

Report from Legislative Symposium Subcommittee:
Co-Chair Vasaly reported that the subcommittee plans to hold a symposium in February since the legislative session begins February 12. The symposium will focus on the importance of the issue, the necessary background to understand how judicial selection methods relate to the quality of the judges selected and why "outcome based" campaigning works for members of the legislature but not for judges. There will no effort to push a particular plan of judicial selection. It was agreed that the session should be short, not to exceed one hour and thirty minutes. The committee has not yet selected speakers and hoped that they could find speakers who would "draw" attendance. One step in increasing attendance will be to enlist the aid of critical committee chairs. The committee will be speaking with the chairs to encourage them to support the symposium. Members, including the two legislators present, agreed that judicial elections is not seen as a partisan issue and that there is no downside to members contacting their legislators regarding the issue. The MSBA Grassroots Action Network may be brought into play to help in this regard.

Judicial Elections Campaign Conduct Committee (JECCC): Co-Chair Vasaly informed the Committee that documents forming the JECCC were created by the Judiciary Committee in 2006. Due to some concern regarding the activities proposed by the JECCC and restrictions under campaign finance laws, the Committee was never officially formed. A small working group is revising the documents and will present the proposed changes to the MSBA Assembly on December 14 for approval.

Discussion of David Ludescher Letter: Mr. Ludescher briefly summarized his letter for the Committee. Co-Chair Peters reminded Mr. Ludescher that the MSBA took a position on the judicial selection issue at their Assembly meeting in June of 2007. Representative Simon stated that he is misquoted in the letter; he believes legislators can and should promise outcomes, but that promising outcomes is bad for the judiciary. One member commented that the MSBA position was not prompted by a mistrust or distrust of the public, but by a fear of national groups putting out slanted, misleading information which requires the other side to spend a lot of time and money disputing it.

The meeting was adjourned at 1:15 p.m.


MSBA Judiciary Committee
Meeting Summary
Friday, October 26, 2007
12:00 p.m.

Present: Karna Peters and Mary Vasaly - Co-Chairs, Members Don Betzold, Louise Dovre Bjorkman, Gail Chang Bohr, Karen Cole, Jacqui Dorsey, Fred Finch, Kate Flom, Stacey Fujii, Dale Hansen, Tracy Harris, Jerry Lane, Heather Lang, David Ludescher, Steve Simon, Honorable Jon Stafsholt, Mike Unger, Robin Wolpert; Guests Lloyd Grooms, Brian Melendez, Gov. Al Quie; Nancy Mischel-MSBA Staff.
By phone: Steve Besser, Mike Ford, Dana Mitchell, Jo Marie Morris.

Minnesotans for Impartial Courts (MIC):
Former Gov. Quie provided background on this organization, which was formed to promote a constitutional amendment that would provide for gubernatorial appointment of judges for an initial term, based on recommendations by a merit selection commission, with additional terms being determining by retention elections as outlined in the Citizens Commission Majority Report. MIC has two members with connections to the Chamber of Commerce who are going to do fundraising for the group. Himle Horner has been hired to help with publicity. Mary Heller from Debate MN has also been hired. Gov. Quie stated he is finding that groups unaffiliated with either judges or attorneys favor retention elections.

Representative Simon stated that while he personally favors an appointive system he believes a retention election system is much more politically feasible, both with his colleagues in the legislature and with the general public. He has been pushing for an interim hearing on the issue. A retention election bill has been drafted. He recognizes the danger of last-minute campaigns in retention elections, but stated that data gathered by Justice G. Barry Anderson shows that such campaigns rarely, if ever, happen.

Rep. Simon is cautiously optimistic that a bill could actually pass the legislature this session. It will not be easy though, as the legislature has many big items on the agenda, including several proposed constitutional amendments, and it is a short session. He does not see any disadvantage to giving the judicial appointment bill a full push this year, however, even if it does not pass.

Judge Stafsholt reported that the MDJA voted and their first preference is the appointive system favored by the MSBA, second is the status quo and last is retention elections.

Members agreed it made sense to work with the Minnesotans for an Impartial Judiciary group in convincing the legislature and the public that change is needed.

Further Discussion of Educational Symposium for Legislators:
Rep. Simon suggested that an educational symposium could be presented during an interim Committee hearing, even though no official action could be taken. The downside is that non-Committee members would be unlikely to attend. Also, it is very difficult to pull members in prior to the legislative session due to their regular jobs.

Ms. Peters reported that our committee invited former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor to speak at such an event. Former ABA President Bob Stein also sent a letter encouraging Justice O'Connor to come to Minnesota. If Justice O'Connor were to accept the invitation, both Rep. Simon and Sen. Betzold thought a joint session of the legislature could be called.

A subcommittee was formed to work on the legislative symposium, consisting of the following members: Stacey Fujii, Steve Besser, Rep. Simon and Senator Betzold.

Other Educational Efforts:
Several committee members emphasized the importance of talking to members of the public, as well as attorney and civic groups, about judicial independence and how judicial elections might undermine both judicial independence and impartiality. Ms. Peters reported that she made some changes to the powerpoint she showed last time in response to comments raised by the committee. She showed it to a women's group in Alexandria and it was well-received. The powerpoint will be finalized and made available as one tool for us to use to communicate with the public. Ms. Wolpert reported she started to show the powerpoint to attorneys at her firm, but they were not responsive. She thought the information was too basic for attorneys and suggested a different approach might work better with lawyers. Ms. Wolpert has an hour long CLE presentation targeted to law firms that was done as part of encouraging attorneys to speak about their civic duty in judicial elections. Louise Bjorkman indicated that the ABA TIPS section had presented a forum on judicial independence recently and it is available on CD for use by other organizations. A public education subcommittee was formed to generate ideas to educate the public regarding the issue, including generating a one page fact sheet of frequently asked questions and a fact sheet on what is happening in other states. The goal is to have these fact sheets before the Assembly in December. The following members volunteered to serve on this subcommittee: Dale Hansen, Katherine Flom, Judge Stafsholt, Karen Cole and Robin Wolpert.

The Committee's webpage has a link for "Recent News." Members are encouraged to send items they would like posted under that link to Nancy Mischel at the MSBA.

The next meeting of the Judiciary Committee is Friday, November 30 at noon at the MSBA.

The meeting was adjourned at 1:15 p.m.



MSBA Judiciary Committee
Meeting Summary
Monday, September 24, 2007
12:00 p.m.

Present: Karna Peters and Mary Vasaly - Co-Chairs, Members Don Betzold, Gail Chang Bohr, Karen Cole, Dyan Ebert, Tracy Harris, Dana Mitchell, Tom Neuville, Honorable Bruce Willis, Robin Wolpert, Nancy Mischel-MSBA Staff
By phone: Louise Dovre Bjorkman, Jacqui Dorsey, Stacey Fujii, Dale Hansen, Paul McCarten, Jo Marie Morris, Honorable Jon Stafsholt

Welcome and Introductions:
Mary Vasaly welcomed new and returning members to the Committee and members introduced themselves.

History of Committee:
Mary Vasaly provided background on the work of the committee to date, including the June 2007 MSBA Assembly resolution to support the Quie Commission's minority position of an appointive approach, while not rejecting the majority position of retention elections.

Public Education:
Karen Cole reported on the public education efforts of MN Women Lawyers. MWL speaks to community groups on the topic of an impartial judiciary. They developed a model speech that focuses on how ground rules have changed for judicial elections since the White decision. They also send out a periodic e-alert and have a website; www.judgesandpoliticsdontmix.org or www.dontmix.org.

Judge Stafsholt reported that at the last Minnesota District Judges Association (MDJA) meeting in September 2007, a resolution was unanimously passed to authorize the MDJA President to establish a public education committee for the purpose of organizing a speakers' bureau and a powerpoint presentation to assist judges in educating the public about judicial independence. The goal would be to create a message suitable for presentation to civic groups, college political science students and high school social studies students. A questionnaire will also be sent to each MDJA member to determine their level of preference for judicial selection and retention methods.

Karna Peters went through a powerpoint she developed on the importance of an impartial judiciary with the goal of making it available to members so they can easily understand the issue and in turn explain it to others. Committee members praised the powerpoint and suggested it incorporate more strongly the likelihood that most (all) people will come before a court at some point in their lives, which will reinforce the message that they have a personal stake in the issue.

Discussion of Possible Symposium for Legislators:
The MSBA Assembly in June authorized an expenditure of up to $10,000 "for the purpose of promoting the MSBA position regarding judicial selection - the primary focus would be the education of legislators and the public, which efforts may include the presentation of a symposium discussing the Quie Commission report and the MSBA position on that Report."

Karna Peters reported that a letter is being drafted inviting former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor to speak. Senator Neuville questioned whether the judicial selection constitutional amendment issue is really ripe for this legislative year because if it passes, the funding and the people power required to convince the public to vote yes must be in place. He also stressed that if judicial elections were going to be replaced, there would need to be a workable process to assure accountability of judges. Senator Betzold said key legislators are needed to advance the issue. Both Senators agreed a panel of presenters representing different perspectives on judicial selection would be very useful for legislators.

Members agreed that Kevin Magnuson or another person working on implementation of the Quie Commission's majority report will be invited to October's meeting. Chairs of the House and Senate Judiciary and Governmental Operations Committees will also be invited, along with the Republican leads. In addition, the Chair of MSBA's Legislative Committee, Sue Holden, will be invited with Lloyd Grooms, the MSBA lobbyist.

Mary Vasaly mentioned that the Supreme Court Committee reviewing the Code of Judicial Conduct will hold a public hearing next month.

The meeting was adjourned at 1:15 p.m.


MSBA Judicial Elections Committee
Meeting Summary
Monday, May 21, 2007
12:00 p.m.

Present: Co-Chairs Mary Vasaly and Steve Besser, Members Louise Dovre Bjorkman, Jacqueline Dorsey, Fred Finch, Kate Flom, Mark Gehan, Brian Melendez, JoMarie Morris, Brett Olander, Wayne Struble, Mike Unger, Honorable Bruce Willis, MSBA staff Nancy Mischel
By phone: Paul McCarten, Honorable Jon Stafsholt, Ken White
Guests: Gail Chang Bohr, Phillip Carruthers, Karen Cole, Brian Melendez, Karna Peters

Resolution regarding judicial selection:
Following testimony from Phillip Carruthers who spoke to the Committee in person, members followed up with questions and discussed responses to President Kelly’s email to membership soliciting comments regarding the Quie Commission report. Co-chairs Steven Besser and Mary Vasaly discussed their experiences while serving on the Quie Commission and outlined the information and testimony that the Quie Commission had received and reviewed as the basis for its conclusions.

The Committee, following review of the comments and testimony received, engaged in extensive discussion regarding the optimal judicial selection process, which included the option of retaining the status quo. A motion was made and seconded to adopt the majority position. It failed on a vote of 2-11. A straw vote disclosed an overwhelming majority of Committee members felt proactive change was necessary and preferable to doing nothing. A motion was made and seconded to support the minority position (see Minority Report of Brian Melendez). The motion passed by a vote of 10-3. A motion was then made and seconded to support the Besser approach (see Separate Comments of Steven V. Besser) of preferring an appointive system, but supporting retention elections should that approach pass the legislature. This motion failed on a tie vote of 6-6. The Committee discussion reflected the idea that should the legislature pass a selection system different from the system described in the Minority Report, the MSBA should review and either reaffirm or reconsider its position at that time. Judge Willis abstained from all voting.

Funding Resolution:
The Committee reviewed the language of the funding resolution approved at their April 20, 2007 meeting and it agreed it clearly reflects their intent.

Members thanked Mr. Besser for his service to the Committee; his term as co-Chair ends as of June 30, 2007.

The meeting was adjourned at 1:30 p.m.

MSBA Judicial Elections Committee
Meeting Summary
Friday, April 20, 2007
12:00 p.m.

Present: Mary Vasaly and Steve Besser - Co-Chairs, Louise Dovre Bjorkman, Kate Flom, Benjamin Hayek, Mike Iwan, Brian Melendez, Robin Wolpert,
Nancy Mischel-MSBA Staff
By phone: Paul McCarten, Honorable Jon Stafsholt, Wayne Struble

Discussion of Quie Commission Report:
Mr. Besser and Ms. Vasaly, along with Mr. Melendez, all served on the Quie Commission. They provided background on the Commission's deliberations and recommendations. It was noted that the majority and the minority agree on everything except how a judge obtains a subsequent full term following initial appointment.

Mr. Melendez outlined the procedure developed by the MSBA officers for the Quie Commission report. The report has been referred to the Judicial Elections Committee. The Committee's charge is to: a) review and discuss the report; b) gather input from members; and, c) provide a recommendation for the MSBA Assembly in June. The Committee's recommendation should be in the form of a resolution setting forth a proposed MSBA position either supporting or endorsing the Quie Commission Report (this support could be qualified, i.e. endorsing either the majority report or the minority report), or the MSBA could decline to endorse or oppose the report. The Committee's resolution will then be forwarded to the MSBA Legislative Committee for review and action.

Quie Commission Reporter Robin Wolpert will be providing a brief overview of the report at the April Assembly meeting. MSBA President Patrick Kelly is using various forums (Bench & Bar, Legal News Digest, Assembly meeting, district bar annual meetings) to solicit member comments and input. The Committee, through President Kelly's signature, will send an email to all MSBA members seeking their comments, which will be directed to Nancy Mischel, staff liaison to the Judicial Elections Committee. Nancy will forward any comments to the Committee via email. The Committee will meet one last time on Monday, May 21 at noon to consider the comments, draft and vote on a resolution. The Legislative Committee will meet and take a position on the resolution in time for the Assembly to debate and vote on the matter at their June 29 meeting.

Members discussed whether it was important to have a united front rather than competing proposals, recognizing that regardless of MSBA action, such a goal would be foiled if the MDJA takes a position different from the Quie majority. Discussion followed, with many members noting that MDJA opposition should not dictate our Committee's reason4ed response; and, MDJA taking any position may appear self-serving. Members also debated whether to take a practical approach, recommending what is likely to pass the legislature, or focus on the "best" approach regardless of likely success.

Judge Stafsholt moved that the Committee recommend the pure appointive process set forth in the Melendez Minority Report, but withdrew the motion as premature.

Discussion of Possible Symposium for Legislators:
The Committee approved the following recommendation: Resolved, that the MSBA authorize the expenditure of up to $10,000 for the purpose of promoting the MSBA position regarding judicial selection - the primary focus would be the education of legislators, which efforts may include a the presentation of a symposium discussing the Quie Commission report and the MSBA position on that Report.

The meeting was adjourned at 1:00 p.m.



MSBA Judicial Elections Committee
Meeting Summary
Tuesday, October 24, 2006
1:30 p.m.

Present: Mary Vasaly and Steve Besser - Co-Chairs, Senator Don Betzold, Louise Bjorkman, Larry Buxbaum, Dyan Ebert, Fred Finch, Kate Flom, Paul McCarten, Dean Thomas Mengler, Representative Steve Simon, Wayne Struble, Mike Unger, Nancy Mischel-MSBA Staff
By phone: Patrick Costello, Mike Iwan, Judge Jon Stafsholt, David Stowman

Quie Commission:
Steve Besser updated members on the progress of the Quie Commission; their final report is due in early January 2007. The Committee will meet again to review the Quie Commission report once it is released.

Judicial Elections Campaign Conduct Committee (JECCC):
The Committee discussed the status of the JECCC. After its formation was approved by the MSBA Assembly, the MSBA President made some changes to the Affirmation and then sent it to all judicial candidates and requested they sign it, but specifically asked they not return it to the MSBA. At the time, our Committee was not asked for input on the changes or method of distribution. At the same time, the MSBA obtained several legal opinions regarding the scope of activities the JECCC might undertake but these opinions were not shared with the Committee due to attorney/client privilege. The Chairs regret that the Committee members were not kept apprised of the status of the JECCC and apologize for any resulting misunderstandings. In any event, no further information regarding the JECCC was made available before this meeting.

The Committee invited David Stowman to provide information about the current status of the JECCC. Mr. Stowman attended by telephone conference call. He is chairing a precursor group to the JECCC called the Stowman Committee. This is a smaller group than required by the JECCC Bylaws. The charge of the Stowman Committee will be to review the legal opinions received by the MSBA, make recommendations to the MSBA Council regarding the scope of activities the JECCC might undertake, review the incorporating documents of the JECCC and recommend any necessary changes. The Stowman Committee will meet for the first time in a few weeks.

Judicial Plebiscite:
The plebiscite was conducted electronically from Sept. 18 - Oct. 2 and had a response rate of 19.58%. This is up from 11% in 2004, the first time the poll was done via the internet. Paper balloting prior to 2004 generally received a 20-25% response rate. The total cost of the plebiscite is around $14,000. Members discussed the value of conducting the plebiscite. A motion was made to have the MSBA continue the judicial plebiscite. The motion was seconded and passed.

The meeting adjourned at 2:45 p.m.


Meeting Summary
October 26, 2005
DRAFT

Members Present: S. Besser and M. Vasaly, Co-chairs; C. Anderson, P. Costello (by telephone), D. Ebert, J. Dorsey, M. Gehan, D. Knutson, P. McCarten (by telephone), A.McKinsey, T. Mengler, J. Stafsholt, W. Struble, B. Willis, A. Moravetz, MSBA Staff

Guests: B. Anderson, J. Kostouros, J. Michels

Co-chair Steve Besser called the meeting to order and asked members to introduce themselves. Greg Wersal arrived at the meeting and asked if he could attend – Mr. Wersal is not an MSBA member. The committee discussed Mr. Wersal’s request – as this was both the Committee’s first and organizational meeting, he will not attend, but will be invited to attend a subsequent meeting. Mr. Wersal agreed.

The Committee discussed its charge and how it wants to respond to the White case between now and the 2006 elections. (The Rules of Professional Conduct Committee is looking at changes to the Code of Judicial Conduct.) Following lengthy discussion the committee agreed that:

  1. Several MSBA committees have addressed key issues since 1997 and it is time for action. There was strong support for undertaking an extensive public relations effort to educate the public on the many issues involved in judicial elections.
  2. The Committee will study the use of a campaign conduct committee and recommend structure and procedures for using such a committee in the 2006 election.
  3. The Committee will review the Position Statement approved by the MSBA Assembly in 2004 in light of the recent White decision and issue a revised statement if needed.
  4. The process of selecting judges in Minnesota should be explored by revisiting the Stringer Report from 2003.
  5. The Committee recognizes the need to coordinate its activities with the many groups that are addressing responses to the White decision including the Supreme Court, MDJA, Legislature, League of Women Voters and others, and will recommend that a liaison be established to perform that function. Justice Barry Anderson and a legislative representative should be invited to join the Committee.

The Co-Chairs will set the next meeting and communicate with the Committee in a letter articulating how the Committee will proceed.


- Last Updated 11/11/05 -