|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION SECTION In the past year, the Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) Section has continued in its efforts to be a forum for ADR practitioners in Minnesota. This has included:
Tenth Anniversary of the ADR Institute
Bylaws This year the Section completed its revisions to its bylaws. The bylaws, in addition to technical changes to recognize the growing role of technology in Section activities, provided a focus on three major types of ADR, Commercial, Family and Community. A Vice Chair has been appointed for each area to assure that the interests of practitioners in all areas are taken into account in our programs and activities. The membership has approved the revisions, which will be considered by the MSBA during its June meeting.
Grant Guidelines The Section has traditionally held a significant balance in our treasury. The Section has now enacted Grant Guidelines that provide the standards the Section will follow in considering requests for grants to promote ADR activities and in awarding such grants. Website and Communications The Section has continued to enhance its website and communications. We continue to post all minutes and MP3s of continuing legal education programs on the site for later reference. In addition, the Section has made significant progress toward bringing its Website into the 21st century with more modern graphics and search functions. It is our goal to make the SelectADR™ feature of the site the premier source of information on ADR practitioners in Minnesota, providing profiles and searchable information for Section members who choose to participate. This feature will also be linked through the FindLaw service of the MSBA when completed. We expect to roll out this enhanced site early this fall. In addition, the Section’s Listserve has become more active this year with recent legal and other developments in ADR being posted as well as educational opportunities. ADR Ethics Board The ADR Ethics Board is appointed by the Minnesota Supreme Court to promote and enforce the ethics of ADR Practitioners. This year, the Section cooperated with the ADR Review Board to identify candidates from the Section who could serve on the Board and act as a representative of the Section to the Board. The Supreme Court is expected to make the selection of the Section representative in the near future. Programs The Section continued in its mission of providing high quality education programs to its members, allowing them to earn CLE credit. Be sure to visit http://www2.mnbar.org/sections/
Treasury Respectfully submitted,
- Last Updated 08/03/07 - |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||